By Maciej Markowski
Edition 5 – May 2015 Pages 26-27
Tags: office design • productivity
There has been an historic debate on whether open plan offices are a good or bad thing. Past articles whether in the Guardian1,Dezeen2 or across the pond in the Washington Post3 would suggest that they diminish productivity.Yes,the open plan office is not ideal for privacy and probably bad for conceptual focused work,but it’s a bit like saying a hammer is useless when you need to tighten a screw.The point is you don’t use it for that purpose.Fans of open plan often underline how fantastic it is for building a sense of belonging,team spirit and ad hoc collaboration,often ignoring the challenges of working in an open plan environment. The point I’m making is that introducing open plan into your office is probably a good idea,but you really need to make sure that you provide your employees with a menu of settings which allow them to concentrate,have ad hoc meetings without disturbing their colleagues and provide some privacy for confidential conversations.
Let’s have a look at where open plan works and where it really doesn’t.
Where open plan fails
“There’s mounting evidence that the lack of privacy is causing people to feel overexposed in today’s workplaces and is threatening people’s engagement and their cognitive, emotional and even physical wellbeing.“Donna Flynn,Director of Steelcase’s WorkSpace Futures Research Group
“Many workplace productivity programmes focus on enhancing collaboration,at the expense of concentrated work, which can be equally important. Getting this delicate balance wrong can significantly inhibit your ability to develop new products and services and deliver them to your clients.” Forget the Workplace for Now” JLL Report,20144.
If you ask many employees working in open plan offices what is bothering them,they’ll probably tell you two things: that they cannot focus and they have no privacy.
According to a number of behavioural scientists and evolutionary biologists we all need some time to feel unobserved,unjudged and fully comfortable in our own skin. Modern,open plan based offices simply fail to cater to that need. According to Dr Nigel Oseland,“the absence of physical boundaries will increase the likelihood that co-workers and leaders will interfere with the employee discretion and freedom to work.This lack of autonomy may be a stressor.” It seems that the ability to concentrate is even more impeded. If your job demands a lot of concentration, or learning and remembering new information, your e ciency can drop by as much as ten percent if you can hear people talking around you. Helena Jahncke, an environmental psychologist, used four di erent studies to examine how noise a ects employees. In one of the tests, participants were asked to use several di erent tables of gures to nd a residence built after 1963 that cost more than €57,000 and that had a oor space of less than 63m2. Assignments like this,where you need to remember variables and use them to nd the correct information, were among the hardest for participants working in a noisy landscape.The costs would be higher for demanding work tasks requiring greater thought. Jahncke’s studies show that people tired more easily and became less motivated in noisy surroundings.
But is it possible to solve this problem by investing heavily in acoustic panels? Unfortunately it seems that many acoustic solutions only make matters worse. Jahneck suggests that intelligible speech − understanding what your co-workers
are saying − is the most distracting noise for employees. Unfortunately, if you lower background noise you might make nearby conversations come through better but this can make these remedies counterproductive.
The statistics are quite shocking. According to one of the latest University of California studies, a typical o ce worker
is interrupted as often as every 3 minutes.To make matters worse,it takes us up to 23 minutes to be able to return to the task at hand. Does starting to read the same page of a report for the third time sound familiar?
There are numerous studies pointing out other open plan de ciencies from increasing the number of sick days to increasing stress levels, but many of them were conducted with a really poor methodology as Dr Nigel Oseland describes in his article5.
For instance, take the famous Danish study by Jan Pejtersen6, which found that employees occupying single o ces reported almost half the number of sick days (4.9 days) compared
to open plan (8.1 days) and multi-person room employees (7.1-8 days). I found the study disappointing as it ignored the seniority of employees (aren’t single o ce occupiers usually more senior?)and only counted self-reported absenteeism (how often do managers really take sick days, rather than just work from home,if sick?),ignored the way people commute (are you more likely to catch the u in tube or in your car?) and many other factors.
With all these issues in mind it seems that open plan may really be the devil, but let’s consider the advantages before we make our minds up.
The bene ts of open plan
The most obvious benefit of the open plan offce is its cost e ciency. You only need 1/3 of the space to add a workstation in an open plan offce in comparison to adding one in a single office. In places like London this translates into a considerable cost saving for a company.
Secondly, open plan signi cantly improves the knowledge exchange between employees (see the Knoll study7). One thing that immediately starts happening when you move your employees to an open plan o ce is that they start experiencing the bene ts of ‘constructive eaves-dropping’. People will talk about a problem or a project and suddenly somebody will
join in with a good idea or a solution. In our rapidly changing business environment this is a key benefit.
Thirdly, and it’s connected to the previous point, open plan supports spontaneous brain storming. Whilst working in a single office you tend to deal with most of your problems alone or maybe with one other person, but in an open plan office it’s very easy to ask somebody for help and quickly exchange ideas with your team.This increased collaboration has significant results.According to one Harvard Business Review study, companies that encourage collaboration by switching from closed-o ces to open-o ces realise performance increases (speed and accuracy of work) by 440 percent….